Skip to main content

Tampa DUI Defense Lawyers | Parks & Braxton

ALSO SERVING PINELLAS, & PASCO COUNTIES
Call 24/7 Nights, Weekends & Holidays
Free Consultations
 

DUI Wins

OUR RECENT VICTORIES

Nov 30, 2022 Case: 22-CT-020939 Judge Jacobus
Facts: The defendant was found by police passed out in his car in a Taco Bell parking lot. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, mumbled speech, and he was disoriented. The defendant stated he had drank two IPA beers. While outside the car, he swayed while he stood. The defendant then performed various roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. This was his Second DUI and he was also charged with Second Refusal for not taking the breath test.
Defense: Due to various contradictions in the police reports and the videotape evidence, the State Dropped the Defendant's Second DUI and also Dismissed the refusal charge.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 30, 2022 Case: 22-CT-023836 Judge Silverman
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving with no taillights. The officer noted an odor of alcohol, mumbling/slurred speech, and he exited the vehicle slowly. He also had a sway to his stance and exhibited mood swings. The defendant stated he had drank 2 beers. He started to the do the roadside tests but never finished, so they alleged he refused. He was then arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton had several discussions with the State regarding the evidence. On tape, the officer actually stated that the roadsides are "not normal" and that he "typically doesn't stand on one leg." We pointed this out to the State, and they Dropped the defendant's Second DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 30, 2022 Case: 22-CT-039127 Judge Jacobus
Facts: A caller dialed 911 stating that the defendant was possibly a drunk driver. The officer got behind the defendant and observed her to driving into the bike lane and come to a stop. The officer then got behind the defendant and conducted a traffic stop. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/watery eyes, and was slow stepping out of the car. She then performed the walk and turn, one leg stand, and HGN (eye test). She was arrested for DUI and later blew a .187 in the breath machine.
Defense: After several conversations with State about the case, they Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 30, 2022 Case: 22-CT-021924 Judge Jacobus
Facts: The defendant was stopped for having an expired tag. Officers observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slow/slurred speech, and lethargic movements. He also had bloodshot eyes. After performing poorly on roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .196 and .190 in the breath machine.
Defense: After several negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 30, 2022 Case: 22-CT-034896 Judge Jacobus
Facts: Officers responded to a call that the defendant was unable to maintain a single lane and almost hit a semi-truck. Officers stopped the defendant and noticed an odor of alcohol, red/glassy eyes, and he was slow to exit his car. After performing various roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .137 and .133 in the breath machine.
Defense: Issues were raised by the firm about the lawfulness of the traffic stop due to a lack of corroboration of the driving pattern by the police.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 30, 2022 Case: 22-MM-017205 Judge Jacobus
Facts: Police were called out to a bar because the defendant was causing a disturbance. When police arrived, the defendant was attempting to drive away. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, a drowsy/fatigued look, he stumbled, and appeared clumsy. His speech was slow and he was clumsy with his documents. The defendant refused to do roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. He was also charged with resisting arrest for failing to abide by officer commands. He was tasered due to failing to comply.
Defense: The police reports exaggerated the defendant's level of impairment versus the videotape. The State Dropped the DUI and also Dismissed the resisting an officer charge.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 29, 2022 Case: 22-CT-010239 Judge Farr
Facts: The defendant was stopped after an officer saw him enter a roadway without stopping, make an illegal U-turn at a red light, and drive at a high rate of speed. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol along with an odor of burnt marijuana, slow/slurred speech, and lethargic movements. After refusing to perform roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense: After several discussions with the prosecutor about the case, they Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 18, 2022 Case: 22-CT-010001 Judge Oster
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving without a driver's side headlight. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and fumbling fingers. She then performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .135 and .133 in the breath machine.
Defense: After several discussions with the State regarding the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 18, 2022 Case: 22-CT-008192 Judge Oster
Facts: The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant also admitted to having consumed alcohol. After performing roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense: There was no probable cause to arrest the defendant based on the video tape. The State agreed and Dropped the DUI. He not only received No Conviction on his record, but also received no penalties other than court costs.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 17, 2022 Case: 22-CT-012518 Judge Booras
Facts: The defendant found by police passed out behind the wheel of his car. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he appeared unsteady on his feet. The defendant refused to do any roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense: There was a lack of probable cause to arrest the defendant based on a lack of evidence. The State agreed and Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 15, 2022 Case: 22-CF-008467 Judge Twine-Thomas
Facts: The defendant was stopped for making improper turns and weaving. The officer noticed an odor of marijuana, red/glassy eyes, and constricted pupils. The defendant stated he had smoked a joint a little while ago. The defendant only performed the HGN (eye test) and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a urine test. After his arrest, the police found cocaine and he was also charged with felony possession.
Defense: Prior to trial, after several negotiations with the State, the State Dropped the DUI and the defendant received No felony conviction for the possession charge.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 14, 2022 Case: 22-CT-005858 Judge Cohen for Silver
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. The defendant took over a minute to stop and passed over several areas where he could have stopped, even with lights and sirens behind him. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and glassy eyes. He appeared disoriented and had a flushed face. When asked how much he drank, he responded, "not much." The defendant performed the HGN (eye test) and began to do the walk and turn. He was very unsteady, refused to continue, and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense: When the defendant was stopped, he was immediately placed in handcuffs and ordered out of the car at gunpoint. The firm put forth to the State that the initial handcuffing was an unlawful seizure. Since all of the DUI observations were made after the illegal seizure, (i.e.the handcuffing), they were obtained unlawfully.
Result: The State Dropped the defendant's Second DUI.
Nov 8, 2022 Case: 22-CT-011546 Judge Damico
Facts: Officers were called to a gas station about a possible impaired driver (i.e. the defendant). The defendant was seen exiting the gas station and an officer then observed him strike a curb. The defendant was very slow to stop even in lieu of police lights and sirens. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, red/glassy eyes, and a blank stare. He stumbled getting out of the car, swayed while he stood, and had slurred speech. The defendant performed very poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .185 and .178 in the breath machine.
Defense: The lawfulness of the stop was called into question. The unknown caller gave no specifics facts other than a possible impaired driver. Hitting a curb one time is not probable cause to conduct a traffic stop. Anyone who takes their eyes off the road for a second can bump a curb just like the defendant did.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 7, 2022 Case: 22-CT-012800 Judge Conrad
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, unsteadiness on her feet, and bloodshot/watery eyes. She then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand roadside tests. She was subsequently arrested for DUI and later refused the breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that none of the defendant's "normal faculties" were impaired as required by the Florida DUI statute 316.193. The firm had the State watch the video tape and they agreed.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 7, 2022 Case: 22-CT-026689 Judge Atkin
Facts: The defendant was stopped after the officer observed her driving onto the median and off the right-hand side of the road into the grass three separate times. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant started to do the field sobriety tests but refused to continue during the walk and turn. She was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense: Under Florida law, a defendant cannot be requested to submit to a breath test until after being arrested for DUI. If an officer requests a breath test prior to the arrest, the refusal is excluded from evidence. Here, the officer asked the defendant for a breath test prior to her arrest for DUI. The State Dropped the DUI knowing they would not have the refusal to put into evidence.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 3, 2022 Case: AEBN2WE Judge Lawhorne
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving with no lights after dark. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and a flushed face. Her eyes were also bloodshot and watery. According to the officer, she failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense: After viewing the video tapes, the firm put forth to the State during negotiations that there was a lack of probable cause to arrest the defendant. We based our arguments on her performance on the roadside tests as well as all observations made by the officer prior to the tests. The State agreed and Dropped the defendant's Second DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 2, 2022 Case: 22-CT-035994 Judge Peacock
Facts: The defendant was stopped for not having his headlights on after dark. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and glassy eyes. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was then arrested for DUI and later refused the breath test.
Defense: There was a lack of probable cause to arrest the defendant based on his performance on the roadside tests. Also, on tape, his speech was normal and not slurred.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 2, 2022 Case: 22-CT-031152 Judge Peacock
Facts: The defendant was found unconscious in his running truck in a bar parking lot. Upon awakening him, the officer noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and he appeared unsteady. The defendant refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense: The defendant had no capability to operate his truck while he was sleeping. Thus, he could not have been in actual physical control. Also, he was trying to the do the right thing by coming out the bar, sleeping it off, and not driving.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 2, 2022 Case: 22-CT-009245 Judge Jeske
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding and driving in an erratic "jerky" manner. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred/erratic speech, and she appeared unsteady on her feet. After performing various field sobriety tests, she was arrested for DUI and later blew a .146 and .141 in the breath machine.
Defense: Many observations written in the police reports contradicted the video tape. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Nov 2, 2022 Case: 22-CT-006655 Judge Jeske
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving southbound in the northbound lane. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He admitted to drinking, was unsteady, and had a bracelet on from a bar. He performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew .199, .177, and .183 in the breath machine.
Defense: Under Florida law, two breath samples are required within a .02 margin of error of each other. Here, there were three because the first two were outside the margin of error. Due to discrepancies in the breath results, inconsistencies in the evidence, and several negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Offices Located Throughout the State of Florida