DUI Wins

Jun 28, 2023	Case: 23-CT-001587	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, a red face and fumbling fingers. He also stated he had drank a couple of drinks earlier in the day. After performing roadsides, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .131 and .129 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 28, 2023	Case: 23-CT-001059	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and tailgating. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. She also had difficulty dividing her attention. She then performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .169 and .156 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 27, 2023	Case: 23-CT-010613	Judge Musselman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving with her high beams on as well as weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, a disheveled appearance, and glassy eyes. Her speech was mumbled and she also swayed. After performing poorly on roadside tests, she was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .120 and .117 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After several conversations and negotiations with the State, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 23, 2023	Case: 22-CT-013498	Judge Zuckerman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for having no tag lights. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he had a sway to his stance. He admitted to having drank two beers. He then performed various roadside tests such as HGN (eye test), walk and turn, one leg stand, and estimation of time. He was then arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second refusal to take a breath test and he was also charged with Second refusal.
Defense:	On tape, the officer is heard on his radio and seen on his body worn camera calling for a tow truck prior to the defendant even competing the field sobriety tests. This was brought to the State's attention. In other words, he made up his mind without even giving the defendant a fair shot. The tow truck and even be seen arriving while he was finishing the estimation of time test. The State Dropped the DUI and dismissed the refusal charge.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 22, 2023	Case: 23-CT-004725	Judge Booras
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slightly slurred speech, and his eyes appeared tired and glassy. The defendant appeared unsteady, slightly swayed back and forth, and stated he drank a few beers. The defendant then performed various roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He then blew a .098 and .097 in the breath machine.
Defense:	In conversations with State, we pointed out that due to the .02 margin of error in the breath machine, it placed the defendant's breath alcohol results below 08.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 22, 2023	Case: 23-CT-000617	Judge Grey
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for leaving the roadway multiple times and almost hitting an electrical pole. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, a red/flushed face, slurred/mumbled speech, and watery eyes. His movements were extremely slow and he fumbled while locating his items. The defendant admitted to having drank two beers and his coordination was clumsy. After performing poorly on the field sobriety tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Many observations written in the reports were over-exaggerated and contradicted by the officer's body worn camera. The State agreed and Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 22, 2023	Case: 23-CT-001310	Judge Farr
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash and then slid into a tree. Officers noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, pinpoint pupils, and bloodshot eyes. He also had unsteady balance. He refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	When a defendant refuses to perform field sobriety tests, they must be warned of the adverse consequences. If not, the refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer never advised the defendant of any consequences. In addition, on tape, the defendant's speech was not slurred and he was only off balance because he twisted his ankle during the crash. After several conversations with the prosecutor, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 22, 2023	Case: 23-CT-000956	Judge Farr
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving the wrong way down a one-way street. The officer noticed an odor alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. The defendant admitted to having drank four glasses of wine and the officer also observed vomit on the driver's side door and on the floorboard of the car. After performing field sobriety tests, she was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .139 and .137 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 21, 2023	Case: 23-CT-003680	Judge Moses-Stephens
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a red light and speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and he admitted to having one drink. The defendant then performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Many observations on the video contradicted the written reports. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 21, 2023	Case: 23-CT-017614	Judge Musselman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving all over the road. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred/fast speech, and droopy eyelids. The defendant admitted to having drank a Mike's Hard Lemonade and an open container of said alcohol was found in the car. He also admitted to taking his prescribed narcotic medicines in the morning and was very unsteady. He performed very poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath and urine test.
Defense:	After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 20, 2023	Case: AGR3M1E	Judge Lawhorne
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for swerving several times all over the lanes of travel. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, watery/glassy eyes, and mumbled/slow speech. He also swayed side to side and admitted to having a drank at the Card Room. After performing several roadside tests, such as the walk and turn and one leg stand, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence such as the police reports and videotape, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 16, 2023	Case: 22-CT-002525	Judge Burns
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, a flushed face, and glossy eyes. The defendant admitted to having drank one shot of Crown Royal and two White Claws. She was then asked to performed roadside tests to which she refused. She was then arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI in less than five years.
Defense:	When a defendant refuses to perform field sobriety tests, they must be warned of the adverse consequences. If not, the refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer never advised the defendant of any consequences. In addition, on tape, the defendant's speech was not slurred and she never appeared off balance or unsteady. After several conversations with the prosecutor, the State Dropped the defendant's Second DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 15, 2023	Case: 23-CT-003229	Judge Damico
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, red eyes, and he stumbled while walking. He performed poorly on the roadside tests such as the finger to nose, alphabet, and one leg stand. He was then arrested for DUI and later blew a .191 and .175 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 15, 2023	Case: 23-CT-013432	Judge Silverman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for crossing over lane markers (i.e. weaving). The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, watery/glossy eyes, and slurred speech. His movements were slow and lethargic, he was slow to exit the car, and he swayed while he stood. After refusing to perform field sobriety tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .173 and .156 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 15, 2023	Case: 22-CT-030828	Judge Silverman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/red eyes, and she stated she had drank two Corona beers. She then performed various roadside tests such as the walk and turn, one leg stand, and HGN (eye test). She was then arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Prior to trial, the firm pointed out that none of the defendant's normal faculties were impaired. The State agreed and Dropped the DUI down to a Civil Careless Driving infraction.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 14, 2023	Case: 22-CT-014598	Judge Weis
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a crash whereby he ran a stop sign and hit another car. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, he stumbled, had bloodshot eyes, and appeared unsteady. He refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	When a defendant refuses to perform field sobriety tests, they must be warned of the adverse consequences. If not, the refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer never advised the defendant of any consequences.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 13, 2023	Case: 22-CT-014074	Judge Gutman
Facts:	A call went out to police from the defendant's family that she was missing. An officer spotted the defendant in her truck in a parking lot. The keys were in her possession, she was asleep, and the car was off. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol and vomit on the ground. She then was asked to perform roadside tests to which she refused. She was then arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	The defendant was not in actual physical control as she was sleeping, the car was off, and in a parking lot. She had no "capability " to operate the car.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 13, 2023	Case: 22-CT-014039	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a red light. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech and red/glassy eyes. She also stated that she had two drinks. After performing field sobriety tests, she was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .137 and .121 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After several conversations with the state regarding the evidence and the defendant, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 12, 2023	Case: 21-CT-007287	Judge Bennett for Judge Grode - JURY TRIAL
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding, failing to maintain a single lane, jerking the wheel, and flashing his high beams on and off. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he struggled to retrieve his driver's license. He appeared to have a diminished capacity to utilize fine motor skills, almost fell while picking up his wallet he dropped, and used his truck to maintain balance. He also stumbled and fell against the driver's side of the truck. He then performed the walk and turn and one leg stand. On the walk and turn, he never touched heel to toe, used his arms for balance, and stepped off the line. On the one leg stand, he could not complete the exercise past the number four due to severe balance issues. He was then arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	The firm announced ready for trial. At jury trial, we pointed out there was no video and that all the jury had to rely upon was the testimony of one officer. There was no dash camera, no body worn camera, and no other video or audio devices used. The officer testified that there was no policy preventing them from the videotaping. However, neither the arresting officer, nor three backup officers on scene, chose to even pull out a cell phone to video tape the investigation. In addition, the officer wrote two reports. The first report contained nothing about weaving, using high beams, slurred speech, or stumbling and falling. In his second report, written some time later, he added all those observations. He was impeached as to the difference in the reports. The Jury took only ten minutes to find the defendant Non Guilty.
Result:	The Jury found the defendant NOT GUILTY.

Jun 8, 2023	Case: AGR3YDE	Judge Komninos
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for having no headlights or taillights on after dark. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, disheveled clothing, and his pupils were constricted. His speech was slurred and he used the car for support. He then performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .138 and .136 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.