Skip to main content

Tampa DUI Defense Lawyers | Parks & Braxton

ALSO SERVING PINELLAS, PASCO & POLK COUNTIES
Call 24/7 Nights, Weekends & Holidays
Free Consultations
 

DUI Wins

OUR RECENT VICTORIES

Jan 10, 2013 Case: 2012-CT-001266A Judge Kreider
Facts: The defendant was stopped for entering an intersection against a solid red light and she was also weaving. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and she was wearing a wrist band from a bar. She then performed roadside tasks and according to the officer she failed. She was then arrested for DUI. After her arrest, the officer also found marijuana in the defendant's car and she was also charged with a crime of possession of marijuana. She later submitted to a breath test which revealed the presence of alcohol and also submitted to a urine test which also revealed positive lab results for cocaine.
Defense: Parks & Braxton filed a pre-trial motion to suppress the urine results. In our motion, we alleged that the officer had no legal basis under Florida law and the facts of the case to request the urine sample.
Result: On the day of the motion hearing, the State Dropped the DUI and also dismissed the possession of marijuana charge.
Jan 8, 2013 Case: 11-007778MM10A Judge Robinson
Facts: The defendant was initially observed hitting two parked motorcycles and then leaving the scene. The DUI task force officer pulled the defendant over and observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech and a flushed face. The defendant performed several field sobriety tests on video and was subsequently arrested for DUI. He then refused to submit to a breath test.
Defense: Despite the defendant's performance on the field sobriety tests, Parks & Braxton acquired his medical records which revealed certain illnesses which would explain his performance. Parks & Braxton told the defendant that he should proceed to trial.
Result: On the morning of trial, the State dropped the DUI.
Jan 8, 2013 Case: CT-005567-XGA Judge Weis
Facts: The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. The officer who arrived on scene questioned the defendant about the crash and the events of the evening. The defendant gave inconsistent responses to the officer's questions. She also admitted to taking antihistamines for a cold. The officer then detained her and conducted the HGN (eye test) and believed her to be impaired by either a chemical and/or controlled substance. After the HGN test, she then performed the walk and turn, finger to nose, and walk and turn tests. According to the officer, she failed the tests and then arrested her for DUI. After her arrest, she refused to give a breath and also a urine sample. This was the defendant's second DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that there was no evidence that the defendant was impaired by alcohol, a "specific" chemical substance and/or "specific" controlled substance as required by Florida Law.
Result: The DUI was Dismissed.
Dec 18, 2012 Case: 2012-MM-000306000MMR Judge Becker
Facts: The defendant was involved in a crash whereby he side-swiped another car and struck a DOT sign. The officer observed slurred/thick tongued speech, swaying, and he appeared groggy. The officer believed the defendant to be impaired by a chemical and/or controlled substance. The defendant admitted to taking Xanax and a pain killer. He performed very poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused to provide a urine sample.
Defense: Parks & Braxton were ready for trial.
Result: The State could not prove that the defendant was impaired at the time of the crash by the specific drugs as required by Florida law. The State Dropped the DUI.
Dec 18, 2012 Case: 2012-CT-005812AXXX Judge Shore
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving to slow and affecting other traffic. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and unsteadiness. The defendant refused to perform the field sobriety exercises and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, the defendant refused to give a breath sample.
Defense: Parks & Braxton were ready for trial.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Dec 18, 2012 Case: 2012-CT-012561AXXX Judge Shore
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, swaying, and a flushed face. The defendant refused to perform the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton were ready for trial.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Dec 14, 2012 Case: 5153-XEM Judge Ortiz
Facts: The defendant was stopped for swerving into a curbed median which eventually caused his tires to go flat. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and the defendant admitted to having a couple of beers. The defendant also had slurred speech and was unsteady. According to the officer, he failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Dec 13, 2012 Case: 11-026545MM10A Judge Robinson
Facts: The defendant was involved in a traffic crash. The victim followed the defendant and eventually spoke to a Florida Highway Patrol Trooper. The officer then came into contact with the defendant and observed an odor of alcohol, flushed face, bloodshot eyes, and vomit on the defendant. The officer informed the defendant that he was conducting a criminal investigation for DUI and requested the defendant to perform field sobriety tests. On the walk and turn test, the defendant missed heel to toe, stepped of the line, and turned improperly. On the one leg stand test, the defendant swayed, used his arms for balance, and put his foot down. The defendant was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .108 and .104 in the breath machine.
Result: The State conceded the motion and then Dropped the DUI.
Dec 12, 2012 Case: CT-009122-XBP Judge Dominguez
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding and failing to maintain a single lane. The officer observed an odor of alcohol and bloodshot eyes. He was unsteady exiting the vehicle and also unsteady walking. According to the officer, he performed very poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .133 and .133 in the breath machine.
Defense: Prior to trial, Parks & Braxton discovered that the video tape in the officer's patrol car was either destroyed or never properly uploaded to the computer system. Thus, there was no video tape of the defendant's actions, appearance, and performance of the field sobriety tests.
Result: Prior to filing any motion to dismiss for destruction of evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.
Dec 12, 2012 Case: CT-005445-XEP Judge Dominguez
Facts: The defendant was involved in a one car crash whereby he hit a curb, went airborne, and then crashed into a fence and a wall. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He admitted to having a couple of drinks. He refused all roadside testing on video tape and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton prepared for trial.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Dec 11, 2012 Case: 11-028052MM10A Judge Diaz
Facts: The Police received a call concerning a reckless driver. When the officer observed the defendant he was driving on a rim with sparks flying. The defendant refused to stop while two officers were following him with their lights and sirens on. Eventually, the defendant pulled into an apartment complex and parked his car. The officers ordered the defendant out of the vehicle several times and eventually had to pull him out. The officers observed signs of impairment and requested that the defendant perform field sobriety tests. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn test as well as the one leg stand, he was arrested for DUI. The defendant refused to submit to a breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton took a deposition of each of the officers involved. Based on their inconsistent statements, the firm filed a motion to suppress all of the evidence based on an unlawful detention.
Result: On the day of the motion, the State dropped the DUI.
Dec 10, 2012 Case: 11-001876CTMA Judge Tinlin
Facts: The defendant was stopped based on numerous calls about her swerving all over the road. The deputy who stopped her also observed weaving. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and mumbled speech. She fumbled while looking for her driver's license and staggered upon exiting the car. The officer even had to grab her arm to help her with her balance. She then performed very poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she refused the breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton gathered numerous medical documents from the defendant pertaining to a severe medical condition that she has endured for years. We pointed out to the State that the medical condition prevented her from performing any of the field sobriety exercises well.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Dec 9, 2012 Case: 6987-XEE Judge Seraphin
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving on the rims of her tires as they were blown out. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. After performing poorly the field sobriety tests, she was arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she blew a .189 and .197 in the breath machine.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Dec 9, 2012 Case: 2012-MM-003754 (JURY TRIAL) Judge Schott
Facts: The defendant was stopped by the police after a person called 911 and stated the defendant was driving all over the road, running red lights, and hitting curbs. The officer stopped the car and noticed an odor of alcohol, severely slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and slow/lethargic movements. Once the defendant was outside the car, he was unsteady and incoherent. He performed the roadside tasks at the request of the officer whereby he appeared highly intoxicated. The defendant admitted drinking 4-5 beers that day and also apologized to the officer that he should not be driving. After his arrest for DUI, he refused the breath test. It should be noted that the breath technician at the police station also testified that the defendant was totally incoherent and obviously impaired which was all was captured on video tape. Furthermore, the State played the 911 tape at trial for the jury.
Result: The Jury found the defendant Not Guilty in less than ten minutes.
Dec 7, 2012 Case: 12-2184XGRTWS Judge Salton
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant admitted to having a couple of drinks. According to the arresting officer, he failed the video taped roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. This was the defendant's second DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that none of the defendant's normal faculties were impaired on video tape.
Result: Three days before Jury Trial, the State Dropped the DUI.
Dec 4, 2012 Case: 2012-CT-041996AXXX Judge Baker
Facts: The defendant was stopped for weaving all over the road. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and glassy eyes. A bottle of rum was found in the car. According to the officer she failed the video taped roadside tests. After her arrest for DUI, she refused the breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the video tape contradicted the reports of the defendant's performance on the roadside tests.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Dec 4, 2012 Case: 2012-39354MMAES Judge Davidson
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving without head lights after dark. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and dilated pupils. He also observed bloodshot eyes and she used the vehicle for support. According to the officer, she failed the video taped roadsides. After her arrest, she refused the breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that there was a major problem with the video tape in that you could hardly even see the defendant performing the field sobriety exercises.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Dec 3, 2012 Case: 11-017612MM10A Judge Brown
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving on the wrong side of the road almost colliding with a police officer. The officer approached the defendant and observed a strong odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, a flushed face, dilated pupils and slurred speech. She admitted to drinking and had difficulty exiting the car. She refused all testing. This is the 2nd time Parks & Braxton has successfully defended the client after being arrested for DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton filed a motion to suppress the refusal based on the officer's failure to provide adverse consequences. At the hearing the officer changed his story several times.
Result: The Judge determined that the officer lacked credibility and granted the motion. The DUI was dropped.
Nov 28, 2012 Case: 2012-MM-00499-A-P Judge Ptomey
Facts: The defendant was stopped after a civilian notified police that the defendant was allegedly throwing beer cans out his window while driving down the road. The officer, upon contact, noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, the defendant's clothing smelled like beer, and he swayed. According to the officer, he failed the roadside tests and he was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Nov 27, 2012 Case: CT-008247-XFA Judge Jeske
Facts: The defendant was involved in a single car crash whereby he drove off the road and hit a light pole. The officer who arrived on scene observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he also was swaying as he stood. According to the officer, he failed the video taped roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After is arrest, he blew a .099 and .094 in the breath machine.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Offices Located Throughout the State of Florida